To see the issue content and the abstract you do not have to login
Please login to download the full articles
Lost password? Click here!
If you do not have a subscription to Rhinology please consider to take one.
Click here to become a member of the European Rhinologic Society and a subscriber to the journal `RHINOLOGY`, beginning 2017. Subscription including membership fee: Euro 139.-
If you only want to buy this paper please click here
The price of the paper is 25 euro.
A comparison of minimal cross sectional areas, nasal volumes and peak nasal inspiratory flow between patients with obstructive sleep apnea and healthy controls
Volume: 54 - Issue: 4
Firstpage: 342 - Lastpage: 347
M.H.S. Moxness - V. Bugten - W.M. Thorstensen - S. Nordgård - G. Bruskeland
BACKGROUND: The differences in nasal geometry and function between OSA patients and healthy individuals are not known. Our aim was to evaluate the differences in nasal geometry and function using acoustic rhinometry (AR) and peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF) between an OSA population and healthy controls.
METHODOLOGY: The study was designed as a prospective case-control study. Ninety-three OSA patients and 92 controls were enrolled from 2010 to 2015. The minimal cross-sectional area (MCA) and the nasal cavity volume (NCV) in two parts of the nose (MCA0-3/NCV0-3 and MCA3-5.2/NCV3-5.2) and PNIF were measured at baseline and after decongestion.
RESULTS: The mean MCA0-3 in the OSA group was 0.49 cm2; compared to 0.55 cm2 in controls. The mean NCV0-3 correspondingly was 2.51 cm3 compared to 2.73 cm3 in controls. PNIF measured 105 litres/minute in the OSA group and 117 litres/minute in the controls.
CONCLUSIONS: OSA patients have a lower minimum cross-sectional area, nasal cavity volume and peak inspiratory flow compared to controls. Our study supports the view that changes in the nasal cavity may contribute to development of OSA.
M.H.S. Moxness - V. Bugten - W.M. Thorstensen - S. Nordgård - G. Bruskeland - A comparison of minimal cross sectional areas, nasal volumes and peak nasal inspiratory flow between patients with obstructive sleep apnea and healthy controls
Rhinology 54-4: 342-347, 2016